Dealing with Russians
of the West
psychological
extremely unwise –
and still very dangerous for the globe -
Despite efforts to reach an agreement!
December 5, 2025 04:04
Extremely dangerous; in the event of Russia's economy collapsing, it could lead to its downfall.
and Russia should resort to nuclear weapons, to NEMPs, completely irrationally!
INTERNATIONAL POLITICS is subject to the same elementary rules of LOGICAL ARGUMENTATION as LEGAL LIFE in proper democracies!
At least every criminal judge primarily asks this question:
WHAT PREVIOUSLY AFFECTED THIS AND THAT CRIME?
Why haven't Western foreign policymakers asked this question to this day?
The way Western politicians, military personnel, and media dealt with Russia was and is legally and psychologically utterly foolish - and still is!
On February 23, 2023, an email conversation with one of the highest-ranking former NATO generals, the former "Commander-in-Chief of the Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum" Hans-Lothar Domröse, after his lecture in a Munich cafe, Domröse.
The NATO general gave an absurd response to our warning that one must deal with a nuclear state much more intelligently than the West has been doing since 1991...
"Von: Hans-Lothar Domroese [mailto:Hans-Lothar-Domroese@gmx.de]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023, 11:13 AM
An: BEST-GOVERNMENT.ORG
Subject: Aw: Aw: EMP strike by the Russians
Thank you very much - also for your comments in Munich.
Even if that is the case, the question/challenge remains: do I let myself be (anxiously) deterred - or not?
The Russians have been threatening us/the West for a year now with everything they can to prevent us from helping Ukraine. But we cannot accept that.
Not me, at least.
Warm regards, HLD"
Our answer:
"The strategy of deterrence is one of the correct means of preventing wars. But is deterrence sufficient? Shouldn't we be asking a far more intelligent question about how the conflict with Moscow has developed since 1990 – especially since Mikhail Gorbachev undeniably paved the way for the sensational cooperation between the West and Russia?"
From a legal perspective, the West, through its mega-foolish policy of encirclement by admitting 14 former Warsaw Pact states into NATO – countries which also stored nuclear weapons – has decisively created the current threat situation.
The West became even more brazen:
Clinton gave no answer at all when Putin asked in 2000 whether Russia could also join NATO.
Clinton later told our friends Rüdiger Löwe and Claudia Bussler in the White House gardens that he had no power to ask such a question or to answer it adequately.
And:
Obama even referred to Russia – according to SIIPRI the world's largest nuclear power – as a "provincial power" in 2014.
In 2022, Russia responded with an equally ill-considered and brutal march into Ukraine.
Question for you, a former NATO general:
Wouldn't the far better way have been to cooperate with Gorbachev to build a bloc with Russia against the resurgent Red China?
MfG jb koeppl
NATO expert
The former NATO general did not respond.
This is typical when those in charge are surrounded today.
_______________________________________________
A German media manager, Professor Moritz Hunzinger, Frankfurt am Main with a professorship in Kyiv – allegedly a friend of one of the former presidents of Ukraine, now in close contact with Zelenskyy and also top NATO generals:
He wrote variations of the "standard formula" over several months:
“PUTIN, THE DWARV… RUSSIA: MUST BE DESTROYED!”
We responded in the standard way:
"Why so much stupid hatred for a nuclear-armed country? The Russians will still use their NEMP (Nuclear Electrical Magnetic Pulse) if they continue to be cornered! Then nothing will work in Western Europe anymore, not even Arrow 3 –"
maybe even Bulldogs built before 1950!"
Hello readers:
What will the descendants say?
If they still exist?
"THE UKRAINE WAR - it was easily avoidable!"
Western Europe and the USA bear the ultimate burden of blame for the mega-conflict – unique in world history.
What preceded the attack on Ukraine?
The great, positive, historical achievements of the Russians for the world were not even remotely acknowledged. Russia has already been invaded twice, by Napoleon and Hitler! And in 1962, Nikita Khrushchev, together with the two Kennedys, prevented nuclear war! Gorbachev's concession through the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact was also completely ignored. Boris Yeltsin even implemented Gorbachev's policies—not least with the help of his deputy, Anatoly Chubais.
Vladimir Putin should have been treated very differently…
Hello readers:
That's all for the Russia complex!
However, the serious flaws in security policy permeate all other political departments as well...
in the environmental sector
in the education system
in cultural policy
in economic policy.
_________________________________
*
Wikipedia states that Anatoly Chubais, along with other Russian politicians, wanted to introduce democracy in Russia. In 2022, Chubais fell out of favor with Vladimir Putin because he strongly criticized the invasion of Ukraine.
Details at:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoli_Borissowitsch_Tschubais
Tschubais's daughter was met by NATO expert JB Koeppl around the turn of the millennium in Passau. Koeppl briefly introduced the daughter to the necessary reforms of Western democracies threatened by severe corruption, but subsequently lost contact with her.
**
NEMPs = Nuclear Electrical Magnetic Pulse, which can destroy all electronic devices in Western Europe.