RUSSIANS - DEALING

of the West

psychological

highly unwise –

 

if not super-primitive!

And then it would be extremely dangerous if Russia's economy were to collapse – in which case Russia would resort to its nuclear weapons!

 

 

 

3 September 2025 09:19

 








In advance:

 

INTERNATIONAL POLITICS is subject to the same elementary rules of LOGICAL ARGUMENTATION –

 

such as LEGAL LIFE in proper democracies!

 

 

 

The way Western politicians and media deal with Russia was and still is:

politically and psychologically enormously foolish!

 

This could trigger World War III.

 

 

The evidence:

 

 




In addition, on February 23, 2023, an email conversation with one of the highest-ranking former NATO generals, “Commander-in-Chief of the Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum,” Hans-Lothar Domröse, after his lecture in a Munich cafe, at that time already retired.

The NATO general naively responded to our suggestion that the nuclear state of Russia must be dealt with very differently, much more wisely…

 

 

 

 

 

"Von: Hans-Lothar Domroese [mailto:Hans-Lothar-Domroese@gmx.de]

Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023 11:13

 An: BEST-GOVERNMENT.ORG

Subject: Aw: Aw: EMP strike by the Russians

 

Thank you very much – also for your comments in Munich.

Even if that is the case, the question/challenge remains:

 

I let myself be (fearfully) put off - or not.

 

The Russians have been threatening us/the West with everything for a year now to prevent us/the West from helping Ukraine.

But we cannot accept that.

At least I don't.

 

Best regards, HLD"

 

 

 

 

Our answer:

 

 

 

"Deterrence is a correct way to prevent wars. But is it always sufficient? Shouldn't we ask ourselves more intelligently how the conflict with Moscow has developed,

especially since Mikhail Gorbachev paved the way for the West’s sensational cooperation with Russia from 1990 onwards:

 

From a legal point of view, the West has overturned its super-foolish policy of encircling Moscow by admitting 14 former Warsaw Pact states into NATO –

equipping these states with nuclear weapons –

today's threat landscape has been decisively built up.

 

Mikhail Gorbachev, who was very pro-Western, had previously made gigantic concessions to the West through the dissolution of the Soviet Union - and his successor Boris Yeltsin had continued down this path!

 

But the West became even more brazen:

 

Obama and Joe Biden have, in return, continued to stoke Russian hatred: Obama even described Russia – the world’s largest nuclear power according to SIIPRI – as a “provincial power.”

And Biden further fueled Ukrainians’ hatred of Russia at the Maidan in Kyiv.

 

Finally, in 2022, Russia responded with its equally rash and brutal move into Ukraine! Russia apparently believed it could quickly protect Ukraine from Western interference.

 

A total misjudgment of Russia, at least by 2023!

 

 

Now the question to you, the General:

Hadn’t the far better way been to work closely with Gorbachev,

or

to at least signal to the Russians and the entire world that one will not interfere in the highly sensitive complex of the Warsaw Pact-Russia,

– and certainly not to outsmart Mikhail Gorbachev?

 

Best regards

jb koeppl, NATO expert

 

 

The former NATO general did not respond.

 

 

 

 ***

 

 

From 2024, a German media manager - Professor Moritz Hunzinger from Frankfurt am Main with a chair in Kyiv - who, according to his words, was friends with the first President of Ukraine and then also in close contact with W. Selensky and with the highest NATO generals -

 

He wrote us the "standard formula" over months:

 

“PUTIN, THE DWARF,

AND RUSSIA:

THEY MUST BE DESTROYED!”

 

 

 

We also answered in a standard way:

“Why so much hatred, especially against a nuclear country?”

 

 

 

 

 

From: Moritz Hunzinger [mailto:moritz.hunzinger@actionpress.de]

Sent: Monday, July 21, 2025 19:10

 An: BEST-GOVERNMENT ORG

 

This is what sets us apart:

We are not cowards. Certainly not as cowardly as the Kremlin dwarf.

The only viable way to confront Russia is

- humiliation and

- severe military strikes, which are now also carried out with German weapons.

 

Kind regards

Moritz Hunzinger

 

 

 

We respond:

 

"Hate has never been an element of successful politics.

And not today either!

Only intelligence and a fundamental love, even for the “enemy,” can solve the big problems permanently!

 

Dear Professor:

The Russians under Putin will still use their nuclear weapons, such as the NEMP (Nuclear Electrical Magnetic Pulse), if they continue to be cornered - and then resort to complete irrationality!

 

In that case, nothing will work in Western Europe anymore –

which works via chip technologies, i.e.:

 

no weapon system

no vehicle

no ship,

no plane

no ventilation system,

no heating,

 

maybe the Bulldogs built before 1970!"

 

 

 

 ***









Putin,

the Russian politician, who is unpredictable for fools and has not been understood by the Western elite to this day,

one who seriously or not seriously continues the Gorbachev policy of “perestroika”,

who may actually have wanted to cooperate with the West from 2000 onwards –

but perhaps only because of the Western, completely characterless NATO expansion policy, especially because of the Western interference in Ukraine, to “save his Ukraine”,

 

or one,

 

who from the beginning only pretended to be willing to cooperate with the West, the West - how did the West want to deceive him?

 

 

 

 

THE UKRAINE WAR was easily avoidable,

 

historians will one day say

and maybe

in the year 2060

present this here...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"...to threaten Putin's Russia with the most provocative weapons even from 2024 onwards, such as the German-Swedish guided missile TAURUS, whose warhead bore the strange name MEPHISTO ("Devil"), which could penetrate 500 km deep into Russian territory, strategically important Russian command centers and endanger Moscow,

 

This was as foolish as it was dangerous, especially for Western Europe! Putin's Russia was easily capable of completely disabling a large portion of Western European military and civilian electronics within seconds via NEMP (nuclear electrical magnetic pulse) strikes at an altitude of 100 to 300 kilometers – from space!

At the risk of our own nuclear contamination!

 

The NEMP succeeded,

 

because as a result, not even a single Western European military jeep or tank was running in Western Europe anymore,

 

because 200 million Western Europeans were sitting in their basements without electricity or food supplies,

 

because the politically and psychologically completely untrained German Chancellor F. Merz could only consult with his equally naive French colleague E. Macron by hoofed animals,

 

Macron was no longer able to use his French submarine nuclear weapon, as it was still within the NEMP range at that time,

 

because the Americans abandoned Western Europe.

 

 

 

 

The ultimate burden of blame for this mega-fiasco – unprecedented in world history – rests on Western Europe and the United States. Even in simple legal processes, the true culprits and the main perpetrators are identified by asking this question:

 

 

 

What preceded the acts of violence back then?

What about the Russian attacks on Ukraine?

 

 

 

 

1.

The West failed to acknowledge the Russians' great, positive, historical contributions to the world. Yet, as early as 1962, Nikita Khrushchev and the Kennedys had prevented World War III!

 

2.

Putin—like all other politicians worldwide, not even remotely trained in proper politics, merely a secret agent and lawyer—reacted treacherously. Putin should have been handled very differently, far more skillfully—in fact, the opposite: by integrating him into the West!

 

3.

Added to this was NATO's eastern expansion policy, which between 1991 and 2014 placed NATO nuclear weapons right up to the gates of Moscow, and which, before the attack on Ukraine, incorporated 14 former Warsaw Pact states into the NATO alliance, even disposing of nuclear weapons.

Russia had already been invaded militarily twice in recent history!

 

4.

Above all:

The "Western invasion through NATO integration" took place despite the previously peaceful actions of Mikhail Gorbachev, who even offered the West the path to cooperation between Russia, Western Europe, and the USA against the dangerously expanding Red China - and probably for this reason dissolved the Warsaw Pact!

 

5.

Boris Yeltsin continued Gorbachev’s policies in his own way.

This was also done with the help of deputy Anatoly Chubais. *

 

6.

Putin too – until, after an unsuccessful, completely ignored speech on cooperation in the German Bundestag in 2001 and after Clinton's silence on his proposal for Russia to join NATO, he corrected his cozy course with the West and switched to full confrontation with the West.

 

US President Bill Clinton then confirmed the West's grave error to his friends (Rüdiger Löwe and Claudia Bussler, behind closed doors) in the White House gardens. Löwe and Bussler told NATO expert Dr. JB Koeppl this in a private conversation.

 

7.

President Obama's role was ultimately even more macabre: He even labeled the world's best-equipped nuclear power and the largest country in terms of area as a "provincial power."

And the equally politically inexperienced US Vice President Joseph Biden followed suit, organizing a "fuse against Russia" at the "Maidan in Kyiv" in 2014, fueling hatred against Russia among Ukrainian sections of the population. This resulted in a host of violent acts against Russian minorities in eastern Ukraine – which significantly fueled the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine.

 

There would have been far better options for Russia than attacking Ukraine. See footnote **.

 

8.

From that point on, Vladimir Putin, ego-hurt and striving for fame and greatness, and his even more aggressive successors dreamed of a strengthened Russia that could no longer be humiliated.

They made a pact with Red China, which was equally intent on revenge against the West. Before that, Putin constantly stalled the West in the Ukraine negotiations. See the "Shanghai Conference" in August 2025.

The West was more than naive.

 

10.

Only a cosmic miracle saved the planet.

 







 

WHAT SOLUTION would there be

given at that time?

 

A credible, lasting, comprehensive cooperation between the West and Russia, and through Russia also with Red China, based on genuine, mutual respect!

 

But this policy could only be implemented with the best politicians and smarter populations – which hardly existed at the time!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hello readers:

 

That's a quick look into the year 2080.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   




*


Wikipedia states that Anatoly Chubais, along with other Russian politicians, wanted to introduce democracy in Russia. In 2022, Chubais fell out of favor with Vladimir Putin because Putin strongly criticized the invasion of Ukraine.

Details at:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoli_Borissowitsch_Tschubais

 

Chubais's daughter met NATO expert Dr. JB Koeppl in Passau around the turn of the millennium. JB Koeppl briefly introduced her to the necessary reforms, even in Western democracies threatened by severe corruption, but lost contact with her.

 

 

**

What were and are far better paths for Russia?

Russia establishes the world's FIRST POLITICIANS' SCHOOL and thus builds a stable, positive power

the earth.